While
precious metals traded sideways ahead of the FOMC meeting, the four metals
rallied as the US dollar weakened against the major currencies after the
meeting. Gold jumped above 1,300$/oz. and silver above 20$/oz. However, we
regard the reaction in the precious metals and foreign exchange markets as
overdone.
The FOMC
kept the Fed Funds target rate unchanged at 0.25% or lower and reduced the
total volume of bond purchases by another $10bn. This should not come as a
surprise. The Fed did not provide any hint that the majority of FOMC voting
members would accelerate the speed of tapering. Even with the committee recognizing
“that growth in economic activity has rebounded in recent months”, the stronger
growth compared with the first quarter is not a convincing argument to change
track in monetary policy. Also the improvement in the labor market is not
sufficiently strong enough to justify a faster termination of bond purchases.
The FOMC still regards the unemployment rate as elevated. Furthermore, the
committee states “inflation has been running below the Committee’s longer-run
objective, but long-term inflation expectations have remained stable”. Thus,
also the second target of the Fed does not provide a justification for reaching
the end of bond purchases faster than previously indicated.
The FOMC
also presented its economic projections. It lowered the projection for GDP growth
in this year from 2.8 – 3.3% to 2.1 -2.3%. At a first glance, this might look like
a major revision in expectations for the current quarter and the second half of
2014. However, for the GDP in the final quarter of 2014 to be 3% higher than in
the same quarter of the previous year, GDP has to grow at an average quarterly
rate of around 0.75%. But due to the negative weather, US GDP declined by 0.25%
quarter-on-quarter, which translates into a drop of 1.0% annualized. Taking
this decline into account, the revised projection still implies an average
quarterly GDP growth of around 0.75% for the other 3 quarters in 2014. Thus the
new projection neither reflects a more pessimistic nor more optimistic view of
the FOMC members on the underlying expansion of US economic activity. Also the
revisions for the unemployment and inflation rate are only minor.
There was criticism
that the decision to taper further by $10bn was inconsistent with the revision
of GDP projections. However, as shown, the FOMC has not changed the projection
for average quarterly growth for the remaining 3 quarters. Furthermore, the
revision of the GDP projection has led to accusations that the Fed would always
overestimate GDP growth. The FOMC presents a range of GDP growth, nevertheless,
there remains an imponderability in any forecast of a random time series. And
in the case of the Q1 GDP growth, the weather had a stronger impact on economic
activity than on average during the winter months. Even meteorologists did not
predict such a long cold period before the start of the winter season. Therefore,
the FOMC is not to blame for overestimating the GDP growth in Q1.
But also the
expectation of faster end of bond purchases are not rational based on the expectation
of a recovering US economy. The projections of the FOMC for the dual mandate
variable are only modified slightly. Also the underlying expectation for average
quarterly GDP growth remains almost unchanged. However, for terminating bond
purchases faster the FOMC would have to expect stronger economic activity than
previously assumed. Just forecasting a recovering after the decline of GDP in
Q1 is not sufficient.
The dot
charts are sometimes misinterpreted. But they give a good indication about the
direction of monetary policy and the possible Fed Funds target rate at the end
of the corresponding year. There is still no majority expecting a rate increase
in 2014. Thus, the middle of 2015 remains currently the most likely date for
the first rate hike. However, there appears to be no majority for increasing
the Fed Funds target rate beyond 1.25% by the end of 2015. The dot chart from
the March FOMC meeting showed that the majority did expect the Fed Funds rate
to be only lifted to 1.0%. Thus, the FOMC got a bit more hawkish as far as the
outlook for interest rates is concerned. But the Fed Funds December 2015 future
just prices in a hike to 0.75%.
From our
point of view, the risk is clearly that the FOMC might hike the key interest
rate more than the market prices in during the second half of 2015. This should
be supportive for the US dollar against the euro and the Japanese yen. However,
the Bank of England might increase the base rate earlier. But overall, the
indications provided by the FOMC do not support arguments for a weaker US
dollar. Thus, the FOMC policy outlook is also not positive for the precious
metals.
But there
is not only a danger for precious metals of the Fed monetary policy outlook for
2015 via the influence of the US dollar on precious metals. At the current
yield of 2.62% on 10yr US Treasury notes, there is hardly any downside
potential left unless economic conditions weaken surprisingly and would derail
the FOMC policy projections. A rise of the Fed Funds target rate to 1.25%
within the next 18 months should also lift yields higher at the medium- to
long-term maturity range. Given the outlook provided by the FOMC, 10yr US
Treasury yields in the range between 2.75 – 3.0% appear more appropriate and
2.62% looks as expensive. A rise of US Treasury yields also increase the opportunity
costs for holding precious metals. Thus, also the medium-term outlook for the
US Treasury market is a negative factor for gold and silver.
The given post in enough to give idea about the market and trading tips given by Epic Research are quite helpful.
ReplyDelete