Also at the
start of the New Year, we participated at some polls about price forecasts for
precious and base metals. Unfortunately, a sick leave prevented us from writing
about these forecasts in this blog earlier. In-between, the LBMA has published
their analyst polls in the 2014 LBMA
Precious Metals Forecast Survey, a 29 page document containing the
forecasts of various analysts as well as some short arguments for their
predictions. Another poll by ThomsonReuters just published the consensus
forecasts for precious and base metals.
There is an
old adage at Wall Street that as the first week goes, so goes the year. A
similar one is called the January effect and states that the performance of the
stock indices in January indicates whether the stock market will be up or down
for the whole year. The first few weeks of the year 2014 indicate that the
factors having an impact on metals in 2013 will also drive the markets this
year.
While the
S&P 500 index is down compared with the end of last year, precious metals
posted gains with the exception of silver. However, when we refer to the
January effect, we don’t predict that the bear market in precious metals would
be over and that gold would be in a bull market in 2014. What could have been
observed already in the second half of last year was a significant, negative
relationship between the returns of gold and the S&P index, while in the
period from 2009 until the end of 2012, this relationship was positive. This
pattern also prevailed so far this year and we expect it will also persist
during the remainder of 2014. The reason of the structural break in the
relationship between returns on gold and the US stock market was a change in
the behavior of major institutional investors. The Abenomics in Japan as well
as the announcement of QE3 by the Fed induced considerable shifts in asset
allocations by large investors. Furthermore, the expansionary monetary policy has
not led yet to a rise of inflation rates, which many fund managers expected. Nothing
currently indicates that this behavior would reverse again this year.
After the
strong performance of major stock markets in 2013, it was not surprising that
the year started with a consolidation. The US economy is in a good shape, which
should be supportive for the stock market. Thus, a severe correction or even a
bear market are not the base scenario for the US stock market. Therefore, gold
is not out of the woods and could even fall below last year’s low. On the other
hand, a consolidation of the US stock market could lead to gains in the price
of gold, which could slightly exceed the high reached in August 2013. All in
all, we expect a broad sideways trading range around current levels. However,
for the average price of gold this implies another negative year.
For the
PGMs, we expect a similar trading pattern. However, already last year, they
performed better than gold and silver. Based on forecasts of a stronger global
GDP growth, the demand for PGMs from the automotive sector should increase.
Labor unrests remain the risk factor on the supply side. Based on the
statistics from Johnson-Matthey, we expect that the supply/demand balance will
support the PGMs further. Thus, they are expected to outperform gold and silver
also in 2014.
For the
base metals, China and Indonesia will remain the key factors also this year.
For tin and nickel, the export ban on unprocessed metal is a supportive factor.
Also the stronger global growth should be supportive for these metals. For
aluminum and copper, the key factor continues to be the state of the Chinese
economy. The central bank, the People’s Bank of China, first led short-term
interest rates rise but finally provided liquidity to ease the tensions in the
money market. This demonstrates that the PBoC on the one hand will act if
rising interest rates endanger the current pace of economic activity. But on
the other hand, it would do nothing to spur GDP growth. Thus, we expect that
the growth rates will remain in a narrow band around 7.5%. This will translate
into fluctuations of the widely followed PMI indices slightly above the crucial
50 threshold, which does not exclude that the HSBC PMI might be in some months
below this level. Therefore, we also expect a sideways movement for the base
metals in our central case scenario.
No comments:
Post a Comment