Economic theory of the
Chicago School states that participants in financial and commodity markets form
rational expectations and thus, all information would be included in the
prices. The developments in August demonstrated again that not all expectations
and opinions voiced by traders and analysts are based on a rational analysis
and information processing.
The US
stock market reached an all-time high of the S&P 500 index following the
FOMC meeting on July 31, 2013. But then the stock market for 2-1/2 weeks declined
on fears the Fed could taper the bond purchasing program at the next FOMC
meeting in September. Also the yield on 10yr US Treasury notes rose by almost
30 basis points in the same period and was only a whisker shy of the 2.90%
mark.
But unlike
in earlier situations, the fear in financial markets of the possibility the Fed
might reduce the volume of bond buying played a role contributed to a recovery
of precious metals prices. Quantitative easing is regarded as one reason for
capital flows into emerging economies. With the fear the FOMC might decide to
exit QE3 in September, international investors shifted funds from emerging
economies back into Western economies. As a result, the US dollar weakened slightly
against the major currencies as measured by the US dollar index.
The fears
were driven to some extend also by comments from a few FOMC members. However,
most of those members making statements about tapering opposed the program from
the very beginning. But even more important, most critics of QE3 are non-voting
members this year. Thus, many market participants expected more hints from the
minutes of the recent FOMC meeting and at the same time feared the minutes
would confirm the FOMC would decide to taper in September.
No doubt,
minutes of a meeting could provide some further insights. Nevertheless, the
FOMC statement already send the main message, namely that any decision to
reduce the volume of bond purchases would be data dependent. And the economic
data available at the FOMC meeting did not induce the committee to make a move
towards tapering. Also data released after the July meeting does not provide a
strong case for a decision to reduce the volume of bond purchases in September.
The minutes
even provided arguments, which could reduce the likelihood for tapering at the
next meeting. It has also been pointed out that tapering could increase the
risk of moving towards deflation. This had also been discussed in this blog by
turning the attention to the development of the core PCE deflator, which moved
down towards the 1% level.
Unless
there are shocks, there are normally no U-turns in the voting behavior of the
FOMC members. This means that changes in monetary policy are indicated by an
increasing number of members voting against the current stance of monetary
policy instruments. However, the recent FOMC statement showed that one member
voting against the majority at meetings earlier this year joint the majority at
the July meeting and also voted for a continuation of the current policy.
Thus, the
statement of the July FOMC meeting already provided enough hints that the
minutes would not reveal new information, which would point to tapering in
September. It could not be ruled out that the consensus of Wall Street
economists might be right. However, the FOMC statement and the minutes as well
as economic data released in August so far indicated that the odds are more for
keeping the current volume of bond purchases of $85bn in total also at the
September meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment