Last week, we recommended remaining cautious as the
post US
election rally was not supported by the major fundamentals. This week, gold and
silver gave back a part of the gains made during the preceding week. Only the
PGMs performed better. While platinum ended the week slightly in the plus,
palladium posted a stronger gain. The reason for this outperformance was the
surprising 2012 interim report from Johnson Matthey, which predict a swing from
a supply surplus to a deficit. But also for the PGMs, the further short-term
development will depend essentially on stock market movements.
During the week following the US election,
large speculators increased again their long position in gold futures and
reduced slightly the short position according to the recent CFTC report on the
commitment of traders. Thus, the net long position of the non-commercials
increased 11,418 to 171,594 contracts. The
net long position in silver held by large speculators increased by only less
than 300 contracts to 34,410 contracts in the week ending November 13. We
interpret this development as hedge funds have channeled money back into gold
on the relief that Mr. Bernanke will remain chairman of the Fed and that
quantitative easing will not come to an abrupt end.
However, the development of the past week underlines
that quantitative easing is not a sufficient condition for a rally in precious
metal markets; it is only a supporting factor. And it is also not a necessary
condition. As the case of the PGMs has demonstrated, the factors driving demand
and supply are moving the prices.
In our quantitative models, the US stock market
is a highly significant factor for the price development of the four precious
metals. However, the S&P 500 index serves as a high frequency proxy for
economic activity, which is measured in monthly or even only quarterly
intervals. Expectations about future economic activity have an impact not only
on the investment demand for precious metals, but also for consumer or
industrial demand. This has been underlined last week with the release of the
gold demand and supply report of the World Gold Council, which showed a decline
of global gold demand in Q3 this year. Also demand in China declined
as the pace of economic activity had slowed. Thus, it should not come as a
surprise that precious metals often trade in line with risky assets.
One factor cited for the fall of major stock markets
last week was the preliminary Q3 GDP data in the eurozone. Former ECB chief
economist Stark always pretended that austerity fiscal policy would lead to
economic recovery. However, the multiplier effect of fiscal policy measures is
not below unity as Mr. Stark but also IMF officials tried to make believe. Flawless
quantitative research shows that the multiplier effect is not a constant but
varies with economic conditions. This has also been the result of a recent IMF
working paper. In a recession, fiscal austerity is not leading out of the
recession but could trigger a vicious circle. Greece provides currently the best
example for this inappropriate economic medicine prescribed by the troika of
EU, ECB and IMF. As more and more countries were forced to implement a
restrictive fiscal policy, it is no wonder that the eurozone entered into the
second recession after 2009. But the decline of the eurozone GDP was slightly
less than the consensus of economists had predicted.
Normally, one would expect that the impact of the
eurozone GDP data would not be that strong on international stock markets.
However, combined with the fear of a fiscal cliff possibly looming in the US , the
sentiment was bearish. Many stock markets posted the second weekly loss in a
row, which dragged also gold and silver lower. Thus, the developments at major
stock markets remain the key for precious metals.
No comments:
Post a Comment