Only a rally, which set in with the start of trading
in Europe and accelerated in the afternoon,
prevented on Friday that Gold ended the week lower. Many analysts expect gold
to break out to the upside soon. In an interview with ThomsonReuters,
we pointed out that an upside breakout from the current trading range appears
more likely during the final quarter than during the current one. In this
article, we provide a more detailed explanation for this assessment.
Precious metals currently trade most of the time in
line with other risky assets. However, if there is a new wave of speculation
that the FOMC will embark on QE3, then gold is more driven by falling yields on
10yr US Treasury notes. But safe haven flows into US Treasury notes and German
Bunds as a result of the eurozone debt crisis are not positive for gold as it
trades like a risky asset in this case. Therefore, from our point of view,
either the risk appetite of investors has to increase considerably and stock
markets have to trend higher or the market would have to speculate on the Fed
implementing QE3.
The release of the recent FOMC minutes brought some
bond bulls back to earth last week. The Fed is always ready to act if needed.
However, to implement QE3, the economic situation of the US would have
to worsen significantly. A dip of the ISM manufacturing index below 50 is not
enough. New orders and industrial production would have to contract sharply
over a few months. The labor market report also provides no convincing argument
that the Fed would react quickly as the US economy still creates new jobs
and the unemployment rate stagnated at 8.2%. Thus, unless there is a sharp deterioration
of the economic situation in the United States , the FOMC is likely
to extend just operation twist until the end of this year, but does not take
further measures in the current quarter to stimulate the economy.
Also political considerations could play a role. Of
course, the Fed is an independent central bank and would act if the economy
requires monetary policy measures. However, the closer the US presidential
election gets, the more the likelihood for a further Fed stimulus before the
election date decreases. Furthermore, one has to keep in mind that both houses
of the Congress have to find a compromise on reducing the budget deficit to
prevent automatic cuts, which are regarded as a fiscal cliff. A failure of
reaching an agreement can not be ruled out, given the experience from July and
August last year. Thus, the Fed is right at keeping the powder dry.
After the release of Chinese GDP growth in the second
quarter, which came in line with consensus forecasts, stock markets traded
higher. Probably, some traders had already priced in a sharper deceleration of
economic expansion. Furthermore, sentiment with respect to rate cuts by the
PBoC has changed. Now the market welcomes the outlook for further rate cuts.
However, is this positive news already enough to establish an upward trend in
global stock markets? We have some doubts.
In the US ,
the earning season started last week. Wall Street traded higher last Friday
after JP Morgan released its results. However, this was probably only a relief
rally as JPM still posted a strong gain after losing up to 5.8bn US dollars on
its credit hedge book by the ‘London whale’. On the other days of last week,
earning warnings especially in the tech-sector dominated. Furthermore,
companies gave a more cautious outlook. Against this backdrop, it appears as less
likely that a new upward trend in stock markets will be established.
One has to keep in mind the seasonal factors also.
August and September are traditionally among the weakest months of the year. Of
course, there are exceptions and stock markets also performed well in August
and September as it had been the case in 2009. However, in the current
environment it appears less likely that 2012 will be an exceptional year and stock
markets rally over the summer months.
Furthermore, the debt crisis in the eurozone is far
from being over. The German constitutional court needs more time to decide
whether the German president can sign the law on the fiscal pact and ESM.
Without the president’s signature, the treaties can not be ratified. Given the
weight of Germany , the
ratification of the treaties by Germany
is necessary for the start of the ESM.
No comments:
Post a Comment